Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Hello everyone, since this is the most active topic, I'll ask my question here (this is not a criterion for choosing a topic; I've moved it to a more suitable one. - moderator). I think everyone has noticed that offensive spells used by creatures (for example, lightning used by druids) are quite effective against regular attacks when there are only a few creatures, but the opposite is true when there are many. This raises the question of how this can be balanced. After all, spells are used only a few times per battle, and they should, by definition, be more damaging than regular attacks, regardless of the number of creatures.