"only XL-3"

No complaints about Vanya, I'm just stating the facts: First, the organizer makes a decision based on pure analysis: no report submitted by the deadline – disqualification. Well, since everyone was treated the same, you can only complain for the sake of complaining. Then, a decision is made that a delayed report for a completed game is not "being lazy," as some here wrote. But playing a game half a day late and writing a report for the game in the evening of the same day is, of course, unforgivable. Even if the game was started a long time ago, and one of the participants had things to do (who, by the way, is a member of the Arbitration Committee, and based on whose words I believed the deadline was until June 19th, which Reddit is ready to confirm). And I'm curious how one of the judges can unilaterally change the previous decision without a collegial, official decision. Maybe I can find a judge who will vouch for me? Reddit, would you agree? Or are some people more equal than others. The link at the very beginning of the tournament about strict deadlines is not the same as an interim summary. In the first case, it's about simply fulfilling obligations, in the second – about acting in good faith. And even if we follow the above, there are still those who are more equal among equals. Regarding the group stage, if I'm not mistaken, the deadlines were changed there, as far as I remember, they just deleted the old information and replaced it with new information in the post. I say this because I remember trying to play faster and seeing tighter deadlines, and then suddenly it turned out that I had a month left after all the games (they added new participants)