Forum

Subconscious attitude? Negative residue? Maybe you'll start analyzing my childhood and figure out that I don't like HL+U because someone bullied me at school? What kind of words are these? Why should lost games in HL+U suddenly affect my subconscious, but lost games in M, L, or Jebus shouldn't? It's you and your HL friends who have a prejudice against L templates, and at the first opportunity, you start throwing mud at them. Previously, VT players used to do the same thing towards SoD, by the way; many of them are the same people who are now criticizing HL.
Conversations on stream? Seriously? Can you provide any proof? Because personally, I only remember that Reconstruction was the second and last option from VT that I wanted to see in SoD for many years. And on stream, I also explained why I voted for it.

In short, it's clear, let's end this conversation. If your streams from that time were saved, I could easily provide proof. I 100% remember telling you on your streams that I was in favor of Reconstruction, and you replied that it simplifies the game, then you started saying something less categorical, like "I'm more against it," and you voted after or even during one of your breaks from Heroes, possibly changing your opinion.
PS I don't know if you were bullied at school or not. But it's interesting that you first claim that those who are in favor of HL+U have rigid minds and are incapable of understanding the specifics of papal balances, which are "much better than any HL+U, except maybe 6LM." At the same time, when I ask if you might also be subject to this rigidity/self-deception, but in the opposite direction, you become aggressive and bring up school bullying.
And I'll repeat once more, I don't consider HL+U to be the ideal balance, and I don't think that only they should be played. For example, despite my dislike of Jebus's gameplay, I admit that the template is quite original, and some skill elements are expressed much more strongly there than in any other template.