Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The voting is certainly amusing... But in my opinion, none of the points are feasible. I've mentioned this before: perhaps not immediately, but gradually, everyone learned about the incident, but none of the players openly protested or complained; their silence is a sign of agreement. At first, this also bothered me, but I'm just a spectator, not a player. In general, I think something needs to be done about the games; I didn't like the current format, mainly because so much depends on the map layout. It's almost impossible to miss a chance if you have a good map and your opponent doesn't. When measuring skill among such skilled players, it should be based on skill, and luck can be measured by who faces whom. I don't have any suggestions on how to do this, as I'm not a player and don't play the game.