Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Post-tournament analysis and discussion of the CIS Tournament Regulations.
I wrote a long post, and then it disappeared. So, this time, I'll try to be more concise. First of all, the Swiss system isn't suitable for just 4 rounds; therefore, loss of motivation and various situations are commonplace. The Swiss system should involve at least 8 rounds with 20 participants. Loss of motivation is always inevitable in it. To differentiate between those who are playing and those who are just drinking and doing other things, the system needs some improvement. Increasing the number of days and rounds won't lead to the desired result, in my opinion. Not everyone is ready to play around the clock, and it wouldn't be entirely appropriate either.
In my opinion, the system should be Olympic-style: lose, and you're out. This way, everyone will be highly motivated. Players will keep themselves in check, and those who are eliminated from the tournament can calmly play poker, drink, play soccer, go on excursions, and so on. The list of participants is already roughly known for the tournament. Here, several options are proposed: either the judges create a bracket like in tennis based on ranking, or a blind draw is held immediately before the start. I hope to attend such an event myself someday.