Post-tournament analysis and discussion of the CIS Tournament Regulations.

In general, I see that there are answers. But mostly, armchair critics have latched onto the name of the tournament. And their friends and colleagues throw mud back – I confess, I'm guilty of it too...
This is generally funny and not worth getting upset about – we can call it whatever we want, and those who don't like it can just deal with it. By the way...: the roster changes every year, but every year both top players and mid-tier players participate – you rarely see outright weaklings. Unless I decide to play. If we want, we can call the next tournament: The Open Championship of the CIS Countries in Heroes of Might and Magic, in memory of Armchair Critics and Chat Dwellers, as well as the Anniversary of the First Defeat of the Homunculus at the CIS Countries Championship.

In this thread, the main focus is on the Regulations for future CIS tournaments. Of course, the post-championship drama is a sacred tradition, but let's try to channel it into something constructive. Our task, that is, the task of the target audience of the tournament – which includes its participants and guests – is to develop solutions that will both protect against standard and non-standard negative situations and, in some ways, encourage self-discipline so as not to interfere too much with the main competition. And if a General Regulation is developed for offline CIS tournaments, and if a Concept is developed, then interest in the event will increase, and who knows, maybe more people will start participating.