Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Post-tournament analysis and discussion of the CIS Tournament Regulations.
Wow, what a joke. In absolutely any online tournament discipline, you can gather a higher-level lineup than in a live event, because even in sponsored games, not everyone can come, and those who do come are not always able to perform as well in unfamiliar conditions as they do at their own computer at home. However, the largest gaming events are still held live, and no one is shouting that there would be more strong teams and participants in an online tournament, that the spectators wouldn't distract them, and that they would all play even better, and that only an online tournament could be called the CIS/world/universe championship.
Who stopped all of you dissatisfied people from coming and strengthening this tournament? From easily winning against the "weaklings" who, in your opinion, were gathered there? What is this envy and desire to bash the event just because you didn't have the money or other opportunities to come?