Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

Hmm, you are blaming me for doing something on a whim, but at the same time you say: ...
You know, that sounds a bit ugly...

You took it out of context. It was said very nicely there, but you distorted it here :) I'm saying that I will adjust the ratings based on time and magnitude at my discretion. At the same time, everyone's rating will be adjusted by the SAME percentage. And everyone will retain a portion of their honestly earned rating. And you say that at the beginning of the year, you decide to level everyone out and give everyone ZERO. Well, I don't know who has a better result here :)

They don't have the same level of skill... and no rating will show that... neither mine nor yours, because it is simply impossible... it's like comparing runners in the 100 and 400 meters...

The current rating will show it. Perhaps not absolutely, but at least relatively. Everything in the world is relative.

And they leveled them out so that everyone would have equal chances to take a leading position by the end of the year.

I'm not interested in what chances everyone will have at the end of the year. I said right away that I would try to calculate the CURRENT RATING, and not a cyclic one (that's why I won't reset anyone's rating) and not a cumulative one (that's why the ratings will be adjusted from time to time).

At the same time, the merits of veterans are not erased, because there will be a record that a player scored such and such a rating in a certain year.

If you've noticed, I've already opened the Hall of Fame in my rating :) There, after each Kanigam tournament, the best players are announced, both in terms of the overall rating and in each version separately. So, those who lose all their rating due to aging, if they don't play for a long time, their merits are already recorded in my system :)

Think about what you are suggesting... first (five months) the rating accumulates... then it is halved, then (again five months) the rating accumulates... then it is halved again, then two months the ratings are adjusted after each tournament... then everything cycles...
And is this a normal system in your opinion? You can't figure it out without a "table"... it needs to be simpler...

The point is that it's simpler with a table. And who said that I don't understand it :) You look at the numbers in my rating and SPECIFICALLY say where there is some inconsistency or what you personally don't like about it at the moment? The ratings have only been adjusted once. Don't you understand? Not everyone plays all versions, and I adjust the ratings for ALL players on the forum at the same time. Therefore, after five Kanigam tournaments, everyone could play at least one game if they wanted to. Therefore, after five months, after five tournaments, I adjust the ratings for each game version by 10%. And I adjust the overall rating for ALL by 50%, regardless of how many games someone has played. No one prevents anyone from playing all the games and gaining some rating in each tournament. I don't understand what is not clear. It's all clear to me :) Just pour me a drink... and you too :)