Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Dear tournament participants and other forum members.
Recently, there have been increasing suspicions of violations of fair play rules, and not only.
This raises one question. Why is the following stated in the first post of the tournaments:
7. If any controversial issues arise, please discuss them outside the forum. To resolve them, please contact the tournament host or judge via ICQ and provide relevant save files, ICQ logs, and other necessary information.
Especially if there are no specific facts, and everything is just based on suspicions.
I check the forum almost every day and am online on ICQ. Please contact me about such issues, and we will resolve them.
Please, no more messages of this format in the tournament thread.
Dave_HUN
Maybe a better option would be, if both players agree, they can play a best-of-one match; otherwise, if one player doesn't agree, then a best-of-three match? Just a suggestion.
This option is valid for the double-elimination system.
If we allow this in the Olympic system, some cases may occur where one player will delay the deadline and force another player to play until one victory, which I don't want to allow.