Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Regarding this death and any potential questions arising from it: there will be no rollback. As the GM, I must strictly adhere to the principle I adopted when running my games. I am repeating my post:Xezbeth
Although the mortality rate of player characters is quite high in my games, I always feel a bit uneasy when it happens, because I realize how attached their creators can become to them. But if aggressive actions against the environment remain unpunished and any adventure is devoid of risk, the game will become a walk through a corridor without any intrigue. In other words, according to the game's design and mechanics, this is "not how it should be." Of course, nothing prevents me from making an exception (taking into account that this is the first death and it did not occur due to beheading or something similar), but another issue arises here, which is that it would not be very fair to other players.
If I were to revive a killed character again (especially in such game conditions), I would either have to completely reconsider my approach to the game and remake it into an easy, leisurely stroll, or I would simply feel very uncomfortable in the future when (if) another player character dies again.
kcfgogbfalgfl
