Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Here's another proposal, similar to the first tournament idea – to introduce a decreasing coefficient, but with some slight differences:
1. Initially, all players have a 100% chance of being selected (coefficient = 1).
2. A losing player is excluded from the draw for the next 5 games (this rule already exists in the regulations).
3. For each loss, the selection coefficient of the losing player decreases by 25% (i.e., it will be 0.75 after one loss) for 10 draws in which they will participate.
4. The decreasing coefficient cannot drop below 0.25.
5. For 2 wins as the "King of the Hill," the coefficient decreases by 0.25.
Regarding point 5: A challenger wins a game, then wins 3 more games, and then loses = for 2 wins, the coefficient decreases by 0.25, and for the loss, it decreases by another 0.25. Thus, after 5 games of waiting, they will be included in the draw with a coefficient of 0.5.
Naturally, such a system will be necessary if the number of participants is more than 20-25 people.
Share your opinions and ideas on this point.