The_
Auto-translated
I request that the player Shpillinger be awarded a technical defeat in the match, for the reasons described below.
We agreed to play a mirror match and started the game. I bought the red color and a hero. There was a watering hole near the castle, and I spent the night on turn 111 with one of my heroes on this object. On turn 112, I remembered that something was written on the forum about this object and its bug. Since nothing was described in the header of the tournament topic, I decided to ask my opponent to speed up the process whether it was possible to visit this object. The answer was clear - no, he said that he (the opponent) had not visited it. As a normal person, I believed the opponent and wrote to him, okay, I visited it, so I'll take a restart on turn 112 (in accordance with the tournament rules, I was also surprised that three restarts were prescribed even for a mirror match, but the rules are the rules). To which the opponent replies to me, after I had already left the game and wrote that I would take turn 112, that maybe only the blue player is not allowed to visit it, well, okay, I started looking myself and saw a strange rule about this watering hole, where you need to reload the game, etc. Well, it's not very important to me, I write, let's continue, I have 1 restart, you have 3. To which the opponent tells me that in a mirror match, there is only 1 restart. I inform him that the rules state that there are 3 restarts and that I took my turn 112 only because he reported that it was impossible to visit this object, and he was confident about it. Of course, in order not to receive a technical loss, I took turn 112. Then, the ramblings of a mentally ill person begin, that he could have written to me about the rules, anything at all, that the mirror match is played with only 1 restart, and even if the rules say otherwise, it is not so, etc.
The opponent refused to continue the match without giving any reasons.
We agreed to play a mirror match and started the game. I bought the red color and a hero. There was a watering hole near the castle, and I spent the night on turn 111 with one of my heroes on this object. On turn 112, I remembered that something was written on the forum about this object and its bug. Since nothing was described in the header of the tournament topic, I decided to ask my opponent to speed up the process whether it was possible to visit this object. The answer was clear - no, he said that he (the opponent) had not visited it. As a normal person, I believed the opponent and wrote to him, okay, I visited it, so I'll take a restart on turn 112 (in accordance with the tournament rules, I was also surprised that three restarts were prescribed even for a mirror match, but the rules are the rules). To which the opponent replies to me, after I had already left the game and wrote that I would take turn 112, that maybe only the blue player is not allowed to visit it, well, okay, I started looking myself and saw a strange rule about this watering hole, where you need to reload the game, etc. Well, it's not very important to me, I write, let's continue, I have 1 restart, you have 3. To which the opponent tells me that in a mirror match, there is only 1 restart. I inform him that the rules state that there are 3 restarts and that I took my turn 112 only because he reported that it was impossible to visit this object, and he was confident about it. Of course, in order not to receive a technical loss, I took turn 112. Then, the ramblings of a mentally ill person begin, that he could have written to me about the rules, anything at all, that the mirror match is played with only 1 restart, and even if the rules say otherwise, it is not so, etc.
The opponent refused to continue the match without giving any reasons.
241-568-808