Listen, quick one, you'll explain it to yourself later. If two people you respect, who are also tournament judges, say that it's unclear from the save who might win, Lizard or, conversely, Num, and suggest flipping a coin + providing their arguments, like Dirty did, explaining why he thinks so. Does it turn out that, according to your words, Cobra and Dirty are no longer reliable?
Appeals to someone's authority only work when there are no other arguments. But if there's an opportunity to look at and analyze, then the discussion should be based on the arguments provided by the situation.