KobRa_RR
Auto-translated
You happy, naive people, you haven't seen Artem's map fix.
I'm glad you're still WATCHING))))
I hope to see you (and not just you) in a couple of months!
Added 3 minutes ago
Initially, mirror matches were designed, among other things, to reduce the number of restrictions in the rules. That was the goal of the tournament, and mirror matches only emphasized it. Therefore, they were played on the principle of "everything is allowed."
Exactly, in the competition, the number of rules also needs to be gradually reduced. They are TOO cumbersome. With a bunch of clarifications and notes, even some members of the administration don't know them, let alone the rest of the mortals!! :D
Added 7 minutes ago
And here, the argument about the drunk Amila seems far-fetched to me. With the same argument, you can prove the imbalance of mirror matches - "I ran into the treasury through a nearby, obvious guard and found nothing, and the opponent rushed down a long road through dense guards and found everything." I hear similar arguments from time to time, lol.
You need to scout more, not just move troops back and forth along the chains. Some "pros" don't even reveal the area within a couple of cells along the road, what else can you expect :D
Added 6 minutes ago
An obvious drawback of "everything is allowed" is that if there is a Necropolis artifact, and one player gets the Necropolis hero, and the other doesn't, then the second player is out of luck; the Amplifier is ruthless.
The argument about the Amplifier and the Necropolis is convincing; until there are identical heroes, it should be banned again...
