Where are you, fellow enthusiasts?

It's better to study astronomy. Although, for me, that is also partly some kind of religion.

You confused it with astrology, Yashchur ))
I think it's better here. It's closer to the topic here.:D
Actually, no. For me, religion is faith in something that cannot be proven by direct "evidence".
In astronomy, some things are certainly indisputable (I think nowadays hardly anyone doubts that the Earth revolves around the Sun, and not vice versa), but there are also those built on "circumstantial evidence".
Take the Universe as a whole, for example.
I remember how in school they tried every way to convince us that it was "uncreatable and indestructible", "has always existed and will exist henceforth", etc.
Only a couple of decades passed, and people started talking about how the "creation of the world" actually did happen. At first, they believed it would expand a bit and then start to contract, since "its mass exceeds the critical limit". But a little more time passed and for some reason they changed their minds.
And people sincerely believed in all three of the aforementioned things.:D A fact is 100% knowledge, but 100% certainty in something is not a fact; it's "peace of mind". Get it, Nebo?:mad:

Reasoning on the theme of "everything was this and that because it explains this and that" is nothing other than religion, for it is based on faith, not on facts. You can even add the "supernatural" here if you wish. Judge for yourself: a global "boom" from who-knows-what concentrated in one point, doing who-knows-what before that very "boom"—is that not supernatural?:D