Eggs

As many such games as you like.

Be more specific, please. And preferably turn-based (they appeal to me more than others).

Yashchur, what do you mean by casuals, gopniks, normal players, and tryhards?

Tryhards are those who, in pursuit of some completely useless records, replay battles 10050 times and so on (points in the table, achievements, etc.).
Normal players play for pleasure according to their abilities. They might choose normal (if higher is too difficult), or impossible difficulty (if low is too easy), but they don't chase meaningless records.
Casuals are only interested in the plot; they don't need combat. They simply choose the easiest level and fight on auto-battle. Accordingly, after completing it once, they don't return to the game (they already know the plot, and the combat isn't interesting). In short, they play to "kill time".
Gopniks. Well, here everything is exactly as described in "that very article".
"I want to play on impossible, but without having to try too hard."
"Why are peasants so weak, can't I clear impossible with just them and no losses?"
"Unit X is not bad, but only for the first couple of locations. Buff it, because I'm too lazy to swap it for another one."
"Look, I cleared impossible without losses! One red dragon under invisibility and own armor plus Armageddon rules! I'm an unreally cool guy, aren't I?".
And so on, and so forth.

If I read the plot of a book or movie on Wikipedia, will I be able to judge them? After all, I'll know the technical part.

I didn't understand what you meant, but the technical part helped me understand the screams of one of the players on the forum when he wrote "My Ariman on normal turned out to be harder than on impossible. What the...???".

Are boobs a bad thing?

In this case, yes. It only emphasizes the product's orientation toward idiots. Why? Boobs are 16+, but the difficulty of the games is at a 10+ level. That is, to play you need to be 16 years old with the brain of a 10-year-old. Those are exactly the idiots.

If I read the plot of a book or movie on Wikipedia, will I be able to judge them? That is, when Vasyan creates a sword in Skyrim that kills everyone with one hit, does that say something about the bulk of players? And yes, correct me if I'm wrong, but everything after Princess didn't have much commercial success, and game journalists rated them quite poorly, therefore it's not what the modern consumer needs.

I don't know who Vasyan from Skyrim is, but I can assume that the failure was also related to the fact that not only normal players were dissatisfied, but gopniks as well. Due to completely pathetic balance, which created immense difficulties at the start of the game.