Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Unfortunately, I don't know how the rating is calculated, but if it's possible to add a tournament coefficient to the rating calculation formula, then such an approach would be viable.
It's not difficult to add a coefficient to any formula; the question is, is it needed? Perhaps it would be good to allow a coefficient of 0.5 only for the seasonal league, and possibly for M200 (although this is debatable). skd
In addition, this approach should encourage players to finish tournaments.
Quite the opposite. Such an approach with increasing coefficients will make some players withdraw from an "unsuccessful" tournament so as not to lose even more rating.
Added 6 minutes later StickyFingaz
on the other hand, dads who don't care about the rating will also not care about the Facebook group.
Name me a dad who actively plays Heroes but doesn't care about the Facebook group? All active players currently participate in the selection process. StickyFingaz
with such regulations and a shameful history. it's a pity that there isn't a tournament on Hv with prestige.
How can it be more prestigious than the World Championship, with its impeccable history? :smile15: StickyFingaz
and the hype that there was at one time for a similar tournament on Battle.net (I forgot what it was called).
If I remember correctly, that tournament was never finished.