Tournaments and player rating.

If, by mutual agreement, reports are removed from the ranking, it loses its objectivity, which is why I was against this approach.

Let me clarify my position:
Firstly, if the tournament is official, then all reports should automatically be included in the seasonal and final rankings. No one disputes this.
Secondly, there are now many fun tournaments: with experimental rules, on different versions, and on maps like "Christmas Tree/Panic/M200" or with a 4-minute timer. In such a tournament, pure randomness comes to the fore, and the winner, in my opinion, is the one who is more lucky, not more knowledgeable.)) According to Kostya, this is objectivity. But I believe that it is not. And in this case, if I am forced to report fun games, it is easier for me to skip such a tournament. I can even justify it mathematically.
Thirdly, I don't see a problem here; each organizer of a fun tournament has the right to set their own rules, as they see fit, which is why it is unofficial. The problem is that organizers of new tournaments should plan them in advance and add them to the schedule so that there is no chaos in the organization! (ambiguous phrase)))
In general, I am in favor of a reasonable choice and the possibility of agreeing with the participant before the game!