Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Auto-translated

the point is that the_ must have known in advance about the specifics of how the software works, which led to the first controversial situation! including during the bidding for the color. that's point one.
secondly, when he realized what was happening, he tried to continue the game instead of stopping it immediately.

"let me try to defend myself first"

What are your conclusions based on? Did you not read my statements? Or do you consider them to be false from the start? Although I already know why this was brought up - just for the sake of it. It's something on the level of a cobra, only more concise.

This is the second time I've read such a remark from you. On the one hand, it's unpleasant, and on the other, it's funny. If you think that a team with 3 Muscovites and 1 Siberian is "favoring Siberia," then something is clearly wrong with your head. With such an attitude, I don't want to comment any further.

Let's end the discussion here. I won't get anything from you other than distortions, lies, and evasions of direct answers. It's now a matter of defending your position, no matter how absurd it may be, and that's understandable. If you think something is wrong with my head, then so be it.

241-568-808

Reading content in

Interface language

Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.