Skip to content

Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

User Avatar
#1391
Auto-translated
the response of an average practitioner to a great theorist
even the greatest, there's really nothing better, no exaggeration:
Antoshka
YamaDarma;).. what calculation?!!!
in the calculation, Ve would not have had a chance to take his turn, as the game would have ended on that turn.
and it seems that Hell was initially aiming for this result... but the "calculation" didn't allow him to achieve even 10% of what he intended.
during the entire turn, he only needed to attack with two heroes, maybe that's a very complex calculation...
perhaps I'm wrong, but Hell played - as his experience and attitude towards the game allow him. No more and no less.

EXACTLY!!!
you can argue in any way, but in a real game, before the finale, when the game should end, the timer doesn't matter -- the main thing is to manage to attack in principle, but before that, think everything through so that the opponent's main hero doesn't escape.
that's why they attack in the last seconds, leaving a little time to manage to retaliate and, possibly, gain momentum -- in case the opponent has something up his sleeve and doesn't type "gg".
that's exactly what Hell was counting on! when the attack didn't work out, there were those very seconds left for a backup plan, and then....
baratorch
...there's also this: the more and faster you move the mouse, the stronger the lag.
he had to act quickly, but that's exactly what failed.
and what might have seemed to someone as "the mouse doesn't (un)click" -- don't take Hell for an idiot with claws instead of hands, he probably didn't click any differently than usual.... except that he did it faster, which had consequences -- see above!
"...the personal strengths and weaknesses of a leader are no true indication of the merits of his cause"

(с) Roger Zelazny