Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Let me explain once again for those who don't understand: even if he specified the action 10 times, said that he would do it this way, signed papers with a notary, etc., is there a 100% guarantee that he would perform this action in a real time frame, and wouldn't change his mind later and go somewhere else or delete the hero, etc.? And is there at least a tiny chance that this wouldn't happen?

If he didn't intend to move specifically to that cell, then he probably couldn't have expected any other actions. Watching the video, I clearly see that he pointed the arrow there, a green cross appeared, and the next click didn't work because of the turn transition. I don't know about others, but for me, this is quite enough reason to believe that this move would be made (especially since the move has a specific goal). There is always a chance that he will suddenly start deleting the hero with an army, delete heroes from the company, an earthquake will occur (in all senses of the word), or even Cobra will come to visit, but we shouldn't go to extremes.

Added after 6 minutes

That is, I would be perfectly happy with clarifying this post in the form of "P.S. The decision made is not a precedent for considering other episodes related to lags on the player's computer."

I like this wording. I think no one from the AC will object if I add it.