Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

The_ Because he made that decision during the stream and clicked to move to that cell (he was just a fraction of a second too late). He set the path, but didn't have time to confirm it. So, he definitely would have needed just +1 second for that action. Judging by the stream, the lag "ate up" about 7-8 seconds.

Once again, I'll explain it for those who don't understand. Even if he set the action 10 times, said he would move that way, signed papers with a notary, etc., is there a 100% guarantee that he would have performed that action in a real time frame, or would he have changed his mind later and moved somewhere else, gone to a different place, or deleted the hero, etc.? And is there even a tiny chance that this wouldn't have happened?
Let's answer the question and think about it.

It's not that it "cannot be a fact," but rather that it "is not a fact." In this context, a fact is a verifiable, verified, and confirmed statement. The statement "This is not an HD bug, it's a hardware problem with Hell's computer" is neither verified nor confirmed. However, there is evidence against this statement (provided by both me and Dirty), so it is not only not a fact but also unlikely.

.
Did you even understand what you wanted to say? I don't. The question was asked very precisely, and the answer to it can be yes or no, although when I asked for a clear answer without twisting things, I didn't really expect to get that specific answer from you, which you confirmed.