You may excuse yourself, but it wouldn't hurt you to read the entire thread of this discussion instead of writing obvious nonsense. Because after such bold statements, there is absolutely no desire to evaluate your arguments.

Did I write that I didn't read it, or that I don't know the question?
I watched, I read, and I asked.
Arguments like "nonsense" are written out of the blue. This actually emphasizes that I hit the mark. And this conclusion was confirmed.

Burst in. Right, why read all the messages and delve into the problem if you can just barge in and put everyone in their place?

Is this some kind of "bots" from Hell attacking?:D Instead of factual counter-arguments, there are emotional outbursts.

Hell streamed this game, and there is a cut piece of the recording in the messages above, where everything is visible, how and what happened, so what does "believe on your word" have to do with it?

The stream only records the sequence of events. But not their origin, let alone their interpretation. I'll say even more, if you dwell on every detail. How can you prove that Hell's hand was controlling the mouse? How can you prove that Hell was controlling it from his computer, and not remotely? And there will be many more such nuances.