RAUL
Auto-translated
Here's the situation: yesterday, after losing, Vuzzu Kolbasser decided to withdraw from the tournament, but then said he wanted to play against Uran to test his earned 9 RO, and then participate anyway because there's a session, and in general, he's short on time.
We have Botinki, who didn't make it to the semi-finals for not entirely objective reasons, and who really wants to continue playing in the tournament and has the time to do so.
My thoughts on this: if a person has decided to withdraw from the tournament, they shouldn't take up a spot, but rather free it up for other players. Kolbasser can prove something to himself and the world outside the tournament, especially since he shouldn't participate in a tournament whose system he questions (regarding the validity of Uran's 9 RO). In general, I want to replace Kolbasser with Botinki in the bracket. What do you think about this?
I think any decision you make, Adelaide, will be legitimate, as long as it doesn't turn out that other players who have withdrawn from the tournament will hinder your decision. They may argue why Botinki should continue the fight and not them, for example... this is something to consider, otherwise they may propose a bunch of playoff matches for the right to take the vacant spot, and they will be right in doing so... I can say that this issue is very serious and needs to be approached thoroughly so that there are no more disputes later.
