Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Maybe we should add a clause to the rules: Post the map a couple of days before the tournament for voting. As a commission, I propose the clan leaders, and the leaders will then conduct a poll in their clans and make a decision.
Apparently, you need to be appointed as the tournament organizer so you won't make such suggestions :) And what if the clan leaders and players never reach a consensus on the map. Then we'll just sit and watch endless voting :)
Added after 8 minutes RAPER;87075
So I'm in favor of the automator being allowed and permitted....
This automator is too simplified, and making a powerful automator is too problematic, this was discussed with vbn. Therefore, this automator will not always work. Take this fight with the ballista, if you don't neutralize your troops' morale, the automator won't work. And then you'd have to struggle manually. But how would a player break the rules if he doesn't want to neutralize his troops' morale?? Why would he have to strain his eyes unlike you in this case???? And what would happen if he used vbn's Artifact instead of the automator for this fight?? Can you explain this situation clearly and what makes you better with vbn's automator than that player who decided to complete this fight without neutralizing his troops' morale (since that's not prohibited by the rules)?? What would his violation be if he used ArtMoney in this case??