Skip to content

Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

#1253
Auto-translated
I don't understand the criticism directed at The.
From a formal point of view, he is absolutely right.
There was a certain change in the gameplay that played a decisive role in this match. And he wasn't mentally prepared for it.
It's perfectly logical that he raised the question of "what to do in this case?" to the judges!
In my opinion, the judges' decision was also quite correct. It was mutual - a voluntary agreement to this game variant. And, therefore, to all the gameplay changes that it entails.
It's just that it's not very pleasant when such incidents occur in fairly important matches. But... what can you do? Should we introduce penalties for using such innovations in decisive matches? I don't think that will solve the problem.

It's perfectly logical that annulling the game or penalizing Hell in other ways would be wrong. So, the only thing left to do is to finish this match in the same way as it is.

And in the future, think 10 times before agreeing to use certain changes in the gameplay.
.... шло время, а ситуация не менялась. Мясо продолжало визжать и пищать и главное НИЧЕГО не делать!!!