Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

From conversations with the judges, I learned that The_ spoke about the incident, which he called the "OH case," as soon as I started moving, and he revealed the problem when he realized he was losing the battle with the second wave of troops during the same turn. This is called cheating – initially counting on a victory, seeing a not-so-large enemy army, and only starting to sort things out when it becomes clear that you are losing. Perhaps I am not judging the situation perfectly because of its involvement, but since you wanted to know my opinion, here it is.

You were misled.
If you review my stream, you will see that I realized about this "feature" in the very last battle; before that, there was no talk with the judges or discussion of this situation.

and I didn't suggest using OH

I asked if we would play with OH. You answered yes. In my opinion, this was a mutual decision, but according to your words, it seems that I was persuading you to do it.
241568808 (13:16:13 26/12/2015)
created with 4.1 rc 4, should we use OH?

Hellight (13:16:23 26/12/2015)
yes

who has which heroes, spells, etc.

Considering that you fought with weak units, and you had the strongest Pit unit in the tavern, I think it's obvious, that's your entire army. And you didn't use magic on your main hero; all the battles were with weak units.

this really wouldn't have happened in a normal game

I will repeat my question: was OH created to change the gameplay? Or simply to reduce the time of the game? And in a normal game, as you correctly noted, your 124 would most likely not have happened.