Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

I didn't know that OH was set to 123; for h3dm1 it was way too much, and for Diamond it' same clearly a lot, considering that, for example, in a game with Dave the whole match ended at 115, before that they played h3dm1 and apparently Hell left the settings.

Well, we played 2 matches before this, and in the first one, by the way on the same Diamond, we agreed to play OH up to 123.
My opinion is — I know it's not a bug; even without playing much with simultaneous turns, I am aware of its mechanics. Who finished their turn first has nothing to do with it, because turn synchronization happens after both players have completed their moves... meaning opponents see all movements only after both finish the turn. Based on this mechanic, this action can be classified at most as an OH feature. There is no question about loading a save from the previous turn; the entire match was already clear from the heap of fights that occurred during the turn — who took which objects, who had which heroes/spells, etc. I partially agree with reddi regarding the fact that those who agreed to it are responsible for OH incidents until it becomes stable and approved... on one hand, I can understand The_, such a thing really wouldn't have happened in a regular match, but we both agreed to play a "non-regular" one, and I wasn't the one who proposed OH; it should be noted that I would actually have played SoD with pleasure. On top of all this, from conversations with the judges, I learned that The_ mentioned the same "OH case" as soon as I started moving, but he posted the problem only when he realized he was losing the battle with the second part of the army during that same turn; this is called one-upping — counting on victory first after seeing a not-so-large opposing army and then starting to complain once defeat becomes apparent. Perhaps my judgment of the situation isn't perfect because I am involved, but since you wanted to know my opinion — here it is.