Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I don't see any point in improving Heroes 2. At all. I imagine the adaptation of the Heroes 1-2 Campaigns to the third part (or, better yet, to WoG) like this. First, four campaigns from Heroes 1 (for Ironfist, Slayer, Alamar, and Lamanda). After completing Ironfist's campaign, two campaigns from Heroes 2 open up: for Roland and Archibald, respectively. In the event of completing any other campaigns from Heroes 1, campaigns are unlocked that reveal the storyline associated with Alamar, Slayer, or Lamanda, as if one of them had become the ruler of Enroth instead of Ironfist. It would also be possible to create a campaign for "what would happen if Archibald had won the War of the Succession." The hardest part will be creating the towns from the first and second parts and the intro screens for the missions in the campaigns. There should be no problems with artifacts and scripts if the team works well.