Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Kyle, I have a question for you. Forget about the ballista; I personally don't care what they decide to do with it, the main thing is to inform everyone. But what about battles like a fairy against 1000 zombies? You won't be able to complete such battles without spending time, whether you use an automation tool or not. But there are also other programs, like Arta. What is the difference between it and an automation tool? If you use it fairly for long, but definitely winnable, battles? Moreover, I highly doubt that using Arta can actually be detected. And since there is no way to determine who used Arta and who didn't in a winnable battle, why can't it be used? So, the question is: why didn't you use Arta in the battle with the ballista? Would you have said later that you used vbn's automation tool? The battle can be completed with Arta in just a few minutes. But for some reason, the rule makers initially wanted us to fight for more than 20 hours in manual mode. After I raised a fuss and vbn created an automation tool, the battle time was reduced to (5-14) hours, although it seems that time is no longer a factor, but Kyle gave an example that it does matter. So why not declare Arta as an automation tool and reduce this battle to a few minutes? Then Kyle would have participated in the tournament.
IronAxe