Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
What is the basis for the suspicion towards Sezam? Yes, Snegovik replaced Drakkosha as the boss in my table, but this is irrelevant to Alex's affiliation with the second boss...
For example, consider her actions during the execution of the Shaman. With evidence that was significantly more reliable than the evidence against Alex, she initially proposed a "Not Guilty" vote. This was despite Snegovik shouting about the day of judgment and urging the execution of Alex as a more priority target. And only when it became absolutely clear that the Shaman would be executed, did she cast an ambiguous vote for Alex, as if indicating a desire to execute Jen Li. At the same time, she hinted that they were giving up on the game, and in a serious way, not like Kosh, but not as assertive and self-confident as Snegovik. That is, here Sezam can be interpreted as Snegovik's partner (different tactics, common goal), or as a defender of the Shaman. Isn't this suspicious behavior? However, I doubt the first option, as there are reasons to believe that Uran has been recruited.
This is just one instance. There were other instances where she behaved or wrote from some strange position, which is difficult to describe as anything other than "mafia-like."