Hop-hop.

Online learning is questionable. There is no motivation or social aspect. In my humble opinion, it is only suitable for various non-essential courses when the initiative comes from the students (they choose themselves). Although I cannot assert anything, I have no facts, only assumptions.

As for school, I also mostly rely on assumptions; it's clear that it's more applicable to higher education.
But I don't see any problems with the social aspect – for particularly sociable people, there are group forums – why not create the same for classes?
But with motivation, yes, I don't know what to do. Even I don't always have enough motivation, although I choose the courses myself and choose the ones I need. That is, I am interested in the result, but... What can be said about children then. I don't even know what can be done here.

Added 17 minutes ago

the theory of housekeeping

:eek: I think I missed something in school.
And I also know that in some schools, they practiced changing groups: for half a year, girls learned to cook (as if some of them didn't know how yet) and sew, and boys studied a lathe and other things... And then they switched – boys studied tailoring and sewing, girls – lathe work.
I'm still upset that we didn't have that.

Added 5 minutes ago

I'll tell you with an example. When I studied history, what was the main method of teaching? Students were required to write. When they came home, a student had to spend several hours rewriting information from a book (books) into a notebook, making a detailed summary.

Ah, yes. For me, history is primarily associated with the scribes of historical manuscripts in monasteries.
Apparently, you were being trained to become such a specialist