Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

So what??? Those who played once and got 100, what will they get in a year according to your system? 100 – I guessed correctly :) And will they outperform all the active participants who didn't take first place in any of the Tournaments? In the next year, there will again be people with 100 and only one tournament played. And the active players will again be left out in the cold :)

Why will they outperform the active players? After all, their overall rating will be much lower than that of the active players...

Moreover, according to your scheme, the active players will have worse records in their profiles than the players who successfully played only ONE Tournament this year.
What do you say to that?

I don't understand why the active players will have a worse record in their profile? :confused:
The overall rating is much higher! The number of games is also higher! Well, the average rating is, of course, lower...
but let's compare two records:
1) Rating for 200x = 100, number of games played 1, average rating for the year = 100
2) Rating for 200x = 729, number of games played 9, average rating for the year = 81
which one would you like to see in your profile?
I would like to see the second record in my profile... :D
But, of course, everyone is different, and they have different tastes...

And now a little philosophy:
According to this system, there is no "forgetting" of past achievements... i.e., even if someone won one Tournament, it is already HISTORY! And this must be remembered.
In the case of aging, I don't argue, one-day leaders will not stay on the podium for long... but they will be "hanging around" within the list of players for quite some time. because the lower his rating, the slower he will go down... And for how long? Probably until his rating falls below one... right?
Calculate how long a one-day leader will "hang around" within the list with 10% aging? I got 46 times... tell me, do you need it? From tournament to tournament, this player will slowly die... causing you trouble and creating confusion in the rating...
By confusion in the rating, I mean that it will be completely unclear who here is an active player (but not very successful), and who is a one-day leader. because both will have completely identical numbers...

Summary: According to one system, each player will be assigned and will remain in history his real rating, according to the other, we will only be able to see the leader, and it will be unclear about the rest who of them is an active player (but not very successful), and who is a one-day leader.

Sincerely.