Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

But the decision is strange, though no less strange than not allowing Rebellius to participate in the "Outlaw 2" tournament, so this is already a trend.

Since this situation has been brought up again, I will repeat myself. I simply don't want to include in the tournament someone who insulted me and said a lot of nasty things. I would rather not hold tournaments at all if I am required to make an effort for someone who treats me like that. Why should I try and get negativity in return?

Therefore, Roger's demand to be reinstated in the tournament is quite justified.

On what basis, may I ask?

However, this does not relieve the organizer of the obligation to explain to the player, but not publicly, the reason for the refusal.

And what will that change? If the player who was refused disagrees with the reason for the refusal, then what?

Regarding the situation, I myself don't understand why the refusal occurred, but if there are some disagreements between people, what should be done? In fact, there is a solution. Since there are 2 organizers in the tournament, I don't see any problem with Roger communicating through Palach.