This is unsportsmanlike behavior.
A specific list of facts about the unsportsmanlike behavior and the warnings received for each individual case, indicating my guilt and the unacceptability of such actions in the future.
conflicts with opponents,
A specific list of facts with a review of each case on its merits. As well as warnings issued to me by the judges and organizers, and instructions on the unacceptability of continuing such actions in the future, with a warning about possible decisions by the judges and organizers in case of a recurrence of such conflicts.
constant attempts to "teach" the judges/organizers "how it should be", yes, the same "conspiracy theory", in which you accused me in OFB. Based on this, I decided to protect you from a bad, uncomprehending organizer, and myself from problems related to your participation.
This is probably the ESSENCE of the refusal to allow me to participate in the tournament. That is, my sincere attempts to achieve a more harmonious conduct of tournaments, a systematic approach to making changes to regular tournaments based on discussion and voting (as Pete did) instead of anarchy based solely on the organizers' desire to make radical changes, purely at their own discretion, without discussion or voting.
Yes, I admit my guilt (if this can be called guilt) – I wanted a more harmonious conduct of tournaments and the previous, systematic approach, as under Pete, based on discussion and voting when making changes to the rules of regular tournaments.
But I didn't receive any warnings from the organizers or judges on this issue?! There were no insults or disrespect towards the participants in the discussion about making changes to the tournament rules. Yes, I am an open person and I say what I think, but I don't hold grudges.
So, because of my desire to improve the conduct of tournaments, I am now being denied participation in the tournament?!
I'll say more, most likely this message of mine was the last straw in Zloy Romantik's cup of patience.
To make it easier to choose captains in the last tournament, after registration was completed, there was a table of all participants with their permanent rating.
This table will also help the captains in compiling their table for selecting team members.
Good developments should not be discarded.
I think the AC can figure out whether this is a correct suggestion or an attempt to somehow belittle the organizers.
how it should be", yes, the same "conspiracy theory", in which you accused me in OFB. Based on this, I decided to protect you from a bad, uncomprehending organizer, and myself from problems related to your participation.
I can't answer anything here; I don't understand what's being discussed. I'll review my messages in OFB-9; maybe I'll understand what this is about.
I didn't find anything.
I had no idea that I had some kind of conflict with Zloy Romantik until I was removed from the team tournament!
P.S. To be completely fair, I will note that the changes made to the conduct of OFB-9 (the absence of a draft and the choice of any city), although they were made without discussion and voting, I consider interesting. They helped to provide a new look at the game, although they practically excluded such cities as Inferno, Tower, and Citadel from use.