Good versus Evil - II

besides "everything is not very good, but we are the judges" :)

I didn't see anything like that in my message, not even close. Please point it out.

besides "everything is not very good, but we are the judges" :) is there at least one reasonable explanation of how what I wrote differs in principle from the tournament rules, other than the fact that it is easier to implement in practice?

It turns out I'm not reasonable because I didn't explain it clearly, and I also didn't give the opportunity to discuss the "unreasonable" rules before the start of the tournament. Therefore, please express yourself correctly and do not mention things that are not directly related to the tournament.

And what should I do now? Can I, for example, play 100% with Necromancers against my next opponent...?

Yes, because it is the only possible option among the optimal ones.