Skip to content
#14
Auto-translated
Ganymed;84313


About art.
When, during the Perestroika period, a multitude of so-called "shelf" films were released, I watched them and became terribly nostalgic for the Soviet artistic councils. How they were criticized in the new era! But it turned out that, in essence, these artistic councils created the level of art that we still remember when watching "old Soviet films." What from those same "shelf" films turned out to be a masterpiece? Well, nothing, essentially. About 90 percent is complete mediocrity, and the rest is just "interesting to watch," nothing more. Only a few films (like Intervention) became a discovery. And that's it. And what do we have now? There are no artistic councils, but mediocrity is being shoved down our throats.
You reason in such a way that it seems as if no art existed before the USSR at all, and there was only Soviet classics and "shelf" films from the Perestroika period. There was no Pushkin, no Lermontov. And before the Soviet regime took power in Russia, there was a whole constellation of the most talented writers, composers, and artists who, for some reason, fled this communist country. Even Mayakovsky wrote his masterpieces while being far outside the Soviet Union.
And all the so-called Soviet film masterpieces, for the most part, are naive, rosy-colored garbage, where not the real state of affairs is shown, but only the ideologically verified opinion of Soviet censors on a particular issue.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: dodoD0D0

Users Online 3 users 1461 guests