One for all and all for one 4

The discipline took a long time to establish itself :D Well, yes, I see that all 3 Tournaments went smoothly, without any hitches or scandals involving replacements for players who dropped out.
There are 4 people on the team because in this Tournament, all replacements for players who drop out are FORBIDDEN, which will also add variety – who to choose? A strong player, but one who has a habit of dropping out of Tournaments (we have such players), or an average player, but one who plays to the end :) And, accordingly, with 4 players, the loss of one is problematic, but not as critical as with 3, and there will be fewer meaningless matches; before, with a 2-0 score, you could not even play, but now it's a little more complicated, considering that teams need to equalize, and getting a 3-0 score will be more difficult.
Regarding transfers... there are cases when the captain chooses a player, and that player simply doesn't want to play on that team, he just doesn't want to, and I believe that not only captains should have a choice, but each member of the team as well. I've already had to deal with internal team problems, and I have no desire to repeat that experience, which is why the transfer system was retained.
I've already written about templates – more templates mean more variety.