Skip to content
User Avatar
#933
Auto-translated
In the final table, there is at least one error – Amil was incorrectly credited with a victory over Lim4, although the result was the opposite.

Added 16 minutes later
Palach HP
Regarding this new rule, that you can only play a Castle a maximum of 2 times, I would like to hear whether people like it or not.

I agree with skd and mentioned this during the registration phase – it would be more interesting with a limit of 1 time per Castle. Essentially, I only needed to take a Tower in the second round, and then two mediocre Castles in a row, to feel very comfortable in the later rounds on the Orc, having Rampart, Dungeon, and Necropolis in reserve.
Palach HP
Furthermore, there won't be much formality, but I really want to express my opinion on this tournament. Calculating reduced coefficients or anything else is pointless when your opponent has withdrawn; you will still lose in comparisons (as a rule). I mean, in our tournament, there are more than 25 withdrawals, and it's understandable that I won't participate and the players have lost motivation, but these decisions have affected the overall outcome of the tournament, the coefficients, and the pairings of participants. Imposing sanctions on people is probably pointless, but it would be nice to reconsider this situation. A tournament using the Swiss system is certainly interesting, but there is always room for chance, and stronger players are left out.

I remember that back in 2012, the OFB was held using a group stage + playoff system; wouldn't that be a solution? Withdrawals are inevitable in the Swiss system.
ICQ 423164784