Skip to content

Full random JC

User Avatar
#289
Auto-translated
zloi_romantik
What is there to argue about, according to the letter of the law it's correct — there is an avoidance, so it is played, no complaints to Kostya, the other thing is that perhaps the letter of the law itself should be changed.
PS/I myself voted, in general, to simply remove such a concept as tech rest by block.
+ 1

According to the current rules, yes there is an avoidance, there is no talk of a tech rest, but this game (and not only this game) shows that the rules (like legislation) need to be constantly analyzed and amended.
On the other hand, this is a long-debated topic about using rests. Along the lines of "Chasing chocolate? Then be prepared for a surprise from the generator in the form of an autoloss."
And yet, in my opinion for tournament play, the judges probably made the right decision here, because rests, rests, rests) Most of us have encountered autoloss situations on Jebus Cross. (and not only on it).
Well, for funky games, of course, it would be nice to give the opponent an extra rest)


Statistics

Welcome our newest member: artem