Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I apologize for not being able to read the entire thread right now (I will definitely read it later), and if someone has already raised this issue, please don't be offended.
RomaShSh Archangel – In battle, it only loses to the Behemoth.
Ancient Behemoth – Very interesting units. In melee combat, they defeat any level 7 creature! This is because they remove 40-80% of the target's defense upon hitting. That is, when an Ancient Behemoth hits an Archangel, only 20% of its defense remains – from 30 units, only 6 remain.
I'm sorry, but that's nonsense. How can an Archangel lose to an Ancient Behemoth?
No, of course, theoretically it might be possible, but I don't think it's enough to say that an Archangel loses to an Ancient Behemoth in battle.
RomaShShThus, there are many good units in the castle's army, but the castle has a shortage of good heroes.
What about Sir Mullich? What about Adele? What about Loïn? And that's not a complete list.
Angelman.Rus Ancient Behemoth Wow! This unit crushed everyone, even the Archangel. Its attack reduces the opponent's defense by 90%.
1) What kind of battle was it, where the Ancient Behemoth defeated the Archangel? How did it happen?
2) Doesn't the defense reduction amount to 90%? Isn't it 80%?
Прошу прощения: за знания орфографии русского языка.