Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
And I will allow myself to interject in the dispute of these "highly respected" "gentlemen." Because there is a painfully important and defining question.
First, a brief educational moment based on Wikipedia.
Wic
"Moreover, I am not against establishing and introducing the position of "Tsar of all Hv" with any more or less adequate candidate for it. In my opinion, this is better than democratic chaos."
Caesar, Karl, emperor - these cannot be positions. Dictator and Führer as well. People seize power, and subsequently, no one provides them with protection from the fact that they may end up on the scaffold, humiliated in prison, or in exile.
Democracy is a general term that should be used with caution in the modern world. Democracy in the USA in the 1920s and 2020s looks completely different. And, in my opinion, the issue is not in the political regime. Apart from the definition of democracy according to Franklin, all other "variations" cannot be meaningful at all, and for obvious reasons, democracy according to Franklin is impossible on any forum. Heroin
If the question concerns judging, then definitely, it is not better, but more authoritative than others. As long as I have been playing Hv, I have remembered them in resolving many controversial situations, and all of them were justified.
And the expression about "authority" really grated on my ears. I want to slightly reduce this authority. I don't care about the question of what distinguishes cheating from a violation of the game rules, but there was such a thing in the history of Hv: Pit in Sake for LM
"The player is banned on the forum (his nickname is black). This is an administrative punishment. Why is he banned? He has 160 violation points. If you know the forum rules, you can understand that he has been banned repeatedly. Points were mainly given for rude insults to users. No, you cannot insult and swear on the forum. In addition, this user registered several clones on the forum, which should have been punished with 50 points each, but we no longer gave points for this.
Everything is correct in the point about the fact that it is impossible to communicate and convince people of something when they have judicial and moderator authority at the same time. But, heavens, tell me, where is that "list of clones" published, the ignorance of which causes so much distress in my reading of Hv.
P.S. Gentlemen, keep in mind that you do not need to write any theses continuing the discussion in response to me, for obvious reasons. I will comment exclusively on the "list of clones." I know about the first clone, which, of course, does not overlap with the Homm3 section.
LuckyF
