Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Maybe I am exaggerating, that’s why I wrote that the punishment is debatable, but maybe I’m not exaggerating. How, for example, does a poll about “making the Inferno portal cheaper” differ from ordinary spam? There are penalty points for spam, but not for this. The idea is, of course, raw and needs to be refined, but there should be some kind of regulation on “Conducting Polls.”
Punishing someone for the fact that the author’s opinion in the poll did not reach 33% seems a bit harsh; many factors can influence the outcome (as well as not wanting to change habits...), and we don’t really have any “really malicious trolls” (in the third game) :rolleyes: Dima Surmay
It’s already like that, it’s just not written down anywhere, so people think they have more rights and opportunities. And of course, it would be nice to write all this down, but Pete probably doesn’t need it, i.e., it’s more convenient for him this way.
If it’s not written down, then it doesn’t exist (tautology); rather, the others are just lazy or do it with the wrong “emphasis,” which is why it’s not taken seriously