Skip to content

your questions regarding the game rules (improving the interpretation).

User Avatar
#124
Auto-translated
LuckyF
Danya, what is the fundamental difference between the two Global Objectives in this specific situation? Don't you think it's, to put it mildly, illogical that if Dark Knights were standing next to the Vivians, for example, everything Dark did would be completely permissible, even according to the letter of the law, even though the essence of the benefit from scouting wouldn't change? And in general, there would be no difference at all; it's just that in one situation, for some reason, it's allowed by the letter of the law, and in another, it isn't.
The fact that the rules contradict the game's logic doesn't mean they can be broken. First, we need to acknowledge that Dark violated them in this game, and then look for ways to fix the rules themselves. We have a mess with the rules; Pete governs them as he sees fit, often without even informing people about it.

Added 1 minute ago
Wicc
Are you reading what I'm writing? In post #66, I directly stated that in the Gomunguls-Darkello match, according to the current rules, Darkello committed a violation.

But I also wrote that this violation is not obvious and is a result of an error in the rules, as in similar situations (multiple Global Objectives or a Global Objective shifted deeper into the respawn area), Darkello's action would be legal.
Understood. I didn't understand your subsequent posts that way. The rules definitely need to be fixed. This doesn't negate the fact that there was a violation in this game and an incorrect decision by the judges.
heroes3.tv/juristis
ICQ - 488-784-621, skype - juristis18

Весна 2014.