It’s good that you don’t judge.
Regardless of whether Dark violated the rules or not, he shouldn't be punished because the situation clearly falls into a borderline category and is open to interpretation (the fact that we are discussing this confirms it).
Who knows, maybe it’s a good thing I don’t judge.
But as I said before, the rules should be clear, not like they are now.
I can also say that it’s good that you don’t judge. Otherwise, you would have judged... This conclusion can be drawn from what was written-...
And ambiguous situations should be interpreted in favor of the player, since he has to make decisions under time pressure, and there is no time to delve into the nuances of interpreting the rules.
I think that if you doubt what you can and cannot do, then you should save at that moment and continue after clarifying, rather than having the result interpreted in favor of the player, as stated in the inaccurate rules. And since you didn’t save before such a situation and took action, you get a loss.
and if the opponent (without insults) was informed about the rules, that there is no rematch for the match, but the opponent still refuses to continue playing and eventually refused - what should be done? An adequate decision was made by me and Pete (I already know your decision, but unfortunately, you can't judge yourself).
What’s wrong with us stopping the game, figuring out the situation, and continuing where you lost and started raging?
You can’t walk along the road past efreets, even if the player destroyed devils or dragons.
Added 25 minutes ago
I would like to hear Dirty’s comments on this post:
/topic/at/831168/
Стримы и обучение тут:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWlnXU5R5RLCMuWzIpBc65Q