Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
your questions regarding the game rules (improving the interpretation).
And what about mages or vampire lords? IMHO they can already be considered a block of 10+, although the latter can be broken by Necr or Conflux.
perhaps it is worth adding - shooters 10+, and 19 ul vampires - for the first battle(111) this is more of a block(10 is unpleasant, but it's not a block), and for 113 it is more likely not a block - in such situations with strong monsters, perhaps it is worth adding a judge's review, but I wanted to find a golden mean where players would turn to judges less and could regulate situations themselves and look for fewer loopholes in the rules
updated 1st post regarding p2.4(DD)
Added after 21 minute 2.13. Bugs: only fixed and known bugs are described there, I would add a General clause (is it needed?) - it is forbidden to use bugs that affect the game in any way