Ganymed
Auto-translated
...what Lelya wanted to say is clear: a person readily accepts what is recognized by everyone and not subject to doubt, even if they themselves may not have seen it or know it. And this "knowledge," so to speak, is conditional.
The theory of evolution, for example, did not raise any questions 50 years ago, although Darwin himself questioned his own work.
In principle, this can be said about any phenomenon. When we talk about history, for example, we operate with "facts" recognized by historical science, although we have never seen them ourselves. But here's the paradox - any historical fact can be questioned, in the same way that the theory of evolution was eventually questioned. This, in my opinion, proves that knowledge of the unseen is conditional.
The theory of evolution, for example, did not raise any questions 50 years ago, although Darwin himself questioned his own work.
In principle, this can be said about any phenomenon. When we talk about history, for example, we operate with "facts" recognized by historical science, although we have never seen them ourselves. But here's the paradox - any historical fact can be questioned, in the same way that the theory of evolution was eventually questioned. This, in my opinion, proves that knowledge of the unseen is conditional.
Настоящие герои - не те, пред кем мы преклоняемся, а те, кого мы оплевываем...[/COLOR]
-----------------------------
"So much has gone
and little is new"
David Bowie
-----------------------------
"So much has gone
and little is new"
David Bowie