Skip to content

AK tuning and other modifications.

User Avatar
#49
Auto-translated
It seems like the fifth person now is writing something along the lines of: "Wicc wasn't chosen for the Arbitration Committee (AK), so he started causing trouble." I wrote something similar to the "angry romantic" a little earlier; I'll repeat it: don't project your decision-making logic onto me; you'll most likely be wrong. Regarding the issue at hand, you can check the pre-election thread and see my post from June 22nd (before the voting started):
Wicc
In this regard, if I am elected to the AK, I intend to insist that AK members who do not have current judging experience be required to be appointed as referees for various official Tournaments. This way, they can gain experience, and players can form an opinion about them in this role.

However, I agree about moderation; in my opinion, combining membership in the AK and moderation functions creates risks of abuse. The specifics of the AK are that its actions can sometimes lead to turmoil, including borderline violations, and having a moderator's "baton" creates a temptation to use it, even if formally correct, but at the most convenient moment from the point of view of conducting the discussion. Therefore, I believe that for an AK member, having moderation functions is permissible only for the purpose of editing old posts (rules, statistics). This can also be considered part of my election program.
That is, a direct and unambiguous statement of intent to start stirring things up if elected to the AK. I hope that before the next attempts to psychoanalyze my personality, the authors will study the materials more carefully.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: artem

Users Online 2 users 1585 guests