Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I'm not a big fan of Vic, but he's right about some things.
I partially agree.
Making the activities of the AK open isn't a great idea, but the results should be recorded, along with who voted how, and not like last time... in the previous OFB, a decision was made, and I wasn't even aware of it. Then Rebellius writes to me, asking why such a decision was made, and I'm hearing about it for the first time. In that case, I was on his side; there was definitely some nonsense with transferring the results to the main section.
And our rules are just constantly changing... for some situations, it's necessary to clearly define them so that there isn't even a thought that things could be different.
Also, in the FB tournament, stability is just a dream... the number of players changes, the format is almost random... This is not good at all.
P.S. The analysis of matches should be done properly, and not like Roger Dalta Villa does, when he tells me some nonsense when analyzing a controversial match.