Good and evil.

It feels like people are responding without actually reading the post. I'll have to comment on this simple and harmless text, even though it's already clear enough, for those who... don't read. "What kind of Christianity is that? Ganymede, don't confuse your Russian Orthodoxy with other denominations." It says that there are other denominations (Protestantism and Catholicism) and that they shouldn't be confused. Did you really not understand the jab? "I'm for the Protestants; they recognize direct communication with God, a pure relationship, no intermediaries. They don't consider the Virgin Mary a deity and don't worship her. All controversial issues are resolved solely based on the Bible. It's simple and accessible." This expresses my personal opinion and briefly outlines the differences between Protestantism and the other two denominations. Did you really not understand the jab again? "And there's no need to judge early Christianity based on present-day Orthodoxy and Catholicism, as they differ like night and day." That's absolutely correct. Rituals, clothing, style, and the veneration of all sorts of saints didn't exist at first. These things appeared later with the development of history. I'm talking about the origins, not the current denominations. Did you really not understand what was offensive? In which sentence did I "smear" anything? I didn't expect such frankly stupid and unfounded attacks from you, Wiz, which are both ridiculous and disappointing. :(